Disraeli and the Conservative Party pushed through the Reform Bill of 1867. By giving the vote to many working-class men, the new law almost doubled the size of the electorate.
In the 1880s, it was the turn of Gladstone and the Liberal Party to extend suffrage. Their reforms gave the vote to farmworkers and most other men.
By century's end, almost-universal male suffrage, the secret ballot, and other Chartist ambitions had been achieved. Britain had truly transformed itself from a constitutional monarchy to a parliamentary democracy, a form of government in which the executive leaders (usually a prime minister and cabinet) are chosen by and responsible to the legislature (parliament), and are also members of it.
In the early 1900s, many bills passed by the House of Commons met defeat in the House of Lords. In 1911, a Liberal government passed measures to restrict the power of the Lords, including their power to veto tax bills. The Lords resisted. Finally, the government threatened to create enough new lords to approve the law, and the Lords backed down.
London dock workers unload tea from cargo ships. British customs officials monitored such activities and collected tariffs on foreign imports.
Who opposed tariffs, and why?
People hailed the change as a victory for democracy. In time, the House of Lords would become a largely ceremonial body with little power. The elected House of Commons would reign supreme.
What were the origins of the Liberal and Conservative parties? Which groups did they represent?
During the early and mid-1800s, Parliament passed a series of social and economic reforms. Many laws were designed to help working class families whose labor supported the new industrial society. Among the most controversial reforms was the issue of free trade, or trade between countries without quotas, tariffs, or other restrictions. It pitted landowners and farmers against the middle and working classes.
Britain, like other European nations, taxed foreign imports in order to protect local economies. By the early 1800s however, supporters of free trade, usually middle-class business leaders, wanted to end these protective tariffs. Like Adam Smith, they argued that a laissez-faire policy would increase prosperity for all. Without tariffs they said, merchants would have larger markets in which to sell their goods, and consumers would benefit from open competition.
Some British tariffs were repealed in the 1820s. However, fierce debate erupted over the Corn Laws, which imposed high tariffs on imported grain. (In Britain, “corn” refers to all cereal grains, such as wheat, barley, and oats.) Farmers and wealthy landowners supported the Corn Laws because they kept the price of British grain high. Free traders, however, wanted Parliament to repeal, or cancel, the Corn Laws. They argued that repeal of these laws would lower the price of grain, make bread cheaper for workers, and open up trade in general.
Parliament finally repealed the Corn Laws in 1846, after widespread crop failures swept many parts of Europe. Liberals hailed the repeal as a victory for free trade and laissez-faire capitalism. However, in the late 1800s, economic hard times led Britain and other European countries to impose protective tariffs on many goods again.
During the 1700s, Enlightenment thinkers had turned the spotlight on the evils of the slave trade. At the time, British ships were carrying more Africans to the Americas than any other European country.